7.18.2004

Train for the Look You Want

From PersonalPowerTraining.net:
So the Olympics are almost upon us. While you have the chance, compare the differences between a marathon (long distance) runner’s body and a sprinter’s body. What do you notice? The long-distance runner is skinny, frail, kind of bony, thin and almost sickly looking. On the other hand, the sprinter has well developed muscles, and looks strong, fit, healthy.

Of the two, which one would you rather look like?

Well, this is what should determine how you develop your own training program. If you want to look like the sprinter — and about 98 percent of people desire a sprinter’s body type — why do you spend all that time doing cardio on a treadmill while you watch CNN? In order to look and feel like a sprinter, you must train like one.

Remember, start out slowly. You’re probably not a sprinter now, and if you went out and followed their regimen, tomorrow you’d be insanely sore and probably give up exercising altogether.

Let’s consider, for a moment, these creatures (sprinters). They only move rapidly for about 10 to 60 seconds at most, during a single sprint. Well, that isn’t very much time, if you compare it to long-distance runners, who run for three to four hours, without stopping.

So if long-distance runners are active for much longer periods of time, why do sprinters have more attractive bodies?

The reason is this: sprinters maximally contract their muscles, which requires a lot more work from their bodies than a slow, staggered, constant run. Not to mention that with the short maximal energy bursts, testosterone and growth hormones are released in greater amounts. These hormones are anabolic in nature, which means bodybuilding — they build your body up. On the other hand, running for long durations releases cortisol, a catabolic hormone, meaning it breaks the body down. This effect is associated with muscle wasting, and over time, it is extremely bad for the body. It also is the reason for the ultra-skinny, no-muscle look of a long distance runner, versus that of anaerobic athlete like a weightlifter.

If you think about our anthropological history, we were designed to move rapidly, so we could catch our food back in the caveman days. We weren’t built to run our food to death by having the animal get so tired that it just fell down and collapsed because it was exhausted from our chasing it. Well, that same design serves us today. We may not have to track, catch, and kill our food anymore, but our bodies are still meant to MOVE.

So if you want to look like a sprinter, with a lean, athletic physique, you must train like one. Limiting the aerobic exercise and incorporating an anaerobic weight-training program will cause you to look better and burn fat much more quickly. Anaerobic weight training will elicit more results, both in terms of gaining muscle and melting fat, than any other method of training.

-----------
Scott White is a certified personal trainer and nutritionist located in Scottsdale, Ariz. For more information about nutrition and fitness or for info about a free consultation, call or e-mail Scott today. 480-628-1607 or swhite@personalpowertraining.net.


|

1 Comments:

At 8:30 PM, Anonymous Madein_82 said...

Wonderful theroy that just happens to run(no pun intended) directly in the face of modern science.

For one those "body types" you mentioned, have a great deal to do with genetic predisposition. Paul Tergat(World Record 26.2Miles) Is never going to look like Tim Montgomery. East africans tend to have a predominance of slow twitch mucsle, im not going to go much deeper than to say that slow twitch muscle in genrally slimer and is of course better for longer distance. Were as those of west African decent have a predominance of fast twitch fiber , bigger sronger, faster.

ALMOST all other races tend to be more similar to east african in muscle compisition.

As to your theroy of early Human hunters, i really dont know were to begin. You clearly made it up, as almost all MODERN theroys that deal with human evolution and running seem to find that humans are much better adapted towards long distance running than sprinting when compared to other animals.

For instance almost all animals of moderate skill in running could brun the hell out of Tim Montgomery in regards to top speed( this group would include amoung other animals Elephants and Rinos).

VERY few animals could out run Paul Tergat over a marathon, and as distance increases we get better.
in fact are intelligence and paced running allow humans to out run prey that cannot comprehend paceing.
for instance I am what you might call a Semi-elite distance runner (varsity D2). I have run down jack-rabbits without a great deal of effort. Natural instinct tells these critters that if they run all out and put a few 100m between them and the predators, they live anopther day. However, Humans given there intelligence are able to simply pace themselfs, keep visaul contact, and continue to force the prey item to sprint time and time again. Each time building more and more lactic salts, and eventauly(somewere between 5-6miles) cramping to the point were running is almost impossible.

anyway if you would be intrested in modern theroies of human evolution and running check this article out.

http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v432/n7015/abs/nature03052_fs.html


Nature 432, 345 - 352 (18 November 2004); doi:10.1038/nature03052



Endurance running and the evolution of Homo

DENNIS M. BRAMBLE1 AND DANIEL E. LIEBERMAN2

 

Post a Comment

<< Home